Hydrologic Regionalization of Watersheds. II: Applications

Shih-Min Chiang
Senior Environmental Specialist, Office of Deputy Administrator, Environmental Protection Administration, 41, Sec. 1, Chung-Hwa Rd., Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: smchiang@sun.epa.gov.tw
Ting-Kuei Tsay
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan.
Stephan J. Nix
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ 86011.

Multiple regression analysis (MRA) and a time series model (TSM) are developed and validated for using watershed characteristics to synthesize streamflow hydrographs. Relationships between the streamflow parameters and watershed variables are evaluated by canonical correlation analysis at 94 candidate watersheds. These relationships are constructed using MRA to predict streamflow parameters at six validation stations in two main hydrologic regions. The predicted streamflow parameters are applied to synthesizing specific monthly streamflows by using the developed TSM. The synthetic hydrographs are found to be mostly improved over those found from traditional simple regression equations. Statistical properties and reliability curves of the synthetic Qs are compared with those of the historical records. The statistical properties seem to be well preserved, and the reliability curves are reasonable in one hydrologic region but somewhat biased in the other. The proposed regionalization scheme is validated and therefore considered feasible and reliable for estimating monthly streamflows at ungauged sites.

References

Benson, M. A., and Matalas, N. C. (1967). ‘‘Synthetic hydrology based on regional statistical parameters.’’ Water Resources Research, 3(4).
Bhaskar, N. R., and O’Connor, C. A. (1989). ‘‘Comparison of method of residuals and cluster analysis for flood regionalization.’’ J. Water Resources Planning and Management Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 115(6), 793–808.
Black, P. E. (1988). ‘‘Strange attractors in the closet?’’ Proc., Annual Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.
Chiang, S. M., Tsay, T. K., and Nix, S. J. (2001). ‘‘Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds. I: Methodology development.’’ J. Water Resources Planning and Management Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., in press.
DeCoursey, D. G. (1973). ‘‘Object regionalization of peak flow rates, floods, and droughts.’’ Proc., 2nd Int. Symposium in Hydrology, E. F. Schulz, V. A. Koelzer, and K. Mohmood, eds., Water Resources, Fort Collins, Colo.
Fennessey, N., and Vogel, R. M. (1990). ‘‘Regional flow-duration curves for ungauged sites in Massachusetts.’’ J. Water Resources Planning and Management Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 116(4), 530–549.
Gottschalk, L. (1985). ‘‘Hydrologic regionalization of Sweden.’’ Hydrol. Sci. J., 30(1).
Gulliver, J. S. (1991). ‘‘Preliminary studies: hydrology, hydraulics, and costs.’’ Hydropower engineering handbook, J. S. Gulliver and R. E. A. Arndt, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings, 3rd ed., Macmillan, New York.
Hawley, M. E., and McCuen, R. H. (1982). ‘‘Water yield estimation in western United States.’’ J. Irrig. Drainage, 108(1), 25–34.
Manley, B. F. J. (1995). Multivariate statistical methods, a primer, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall, New York.
McMahon, T. A., (1993). ‘‘Hydrologic design for water use.’’ Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Merzi, N., Usul, N., Ozsaracoglu, Z., and Ozaydin, V. (1993). ‘‘Stochastic modeling of mean monthly runoffs for Coruh Basin, Turkey.’’ Engineering Hydrology: Proc., of the Symposium, C. Y. Kuo, ed., ASCE, New York.
Mosley, M. P., and McKerchar, A. (1993). ‘‘Streamflow.’’ Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Murdock, R. U., and Gulliver, J. S. (1993). ‘‘Prediction of river discharge at ungaged sites with analysis of uncertainty.’’ J. Water Resources Planning and Management Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 119(4), 473–487.
Quimpo, R. G., Alejandrino, A. A., and McNally, T. A. (1983). ‘‘Regionalized flow duration for Philippines.’’ J. Water Resources Planning and Management Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 109(4), 320–330.
SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Volume 1, ACECLUS-FREQ, Version 6, Fourth Edition. (1990a). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Volume 2, GLM VARCOMP, Version 6, Fourth Edition. (1990b). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
Singh, K. P. (1971). ‘‘Model flow duration and streamflow variability.’’ Water Resources Research, 7(4).
Tasker, G. D. (1982). ‘‘Comparing methods of hydrologic regionalization.’’ Water Resources Bull., 18(6).
Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
United States Department of the Interior (USBOR). (1991). ‘‘Lake Nasser simulation model—synthetic inflow trace generators.’’ Irrigation Management System Project Rep., Planning Studies and Model Component (Nile River Projects), Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, D.C.

No comments:

Post a Comment